Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM15-384 vs InfiRay Affo AP13

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The wide-angle Taipan: 384×288 behind a 15 mm lens for a 17.5° view, 290 g, IP67, 50 Hz. Discontinued but still sold.
no live Amazon listing tracked
InfiRay's entry 256×192 pocket thermal with a 13 mm lens, 9.5-hour battery and IP67 rating; 25 Hz refresh.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM15-384InfiRay Affo AP13
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288256×192
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤40 mK
Lens15 mm13 mm
Magnification1.5–12x2–4x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 2x
Detection range710 m670 m
Field of view17.5°13.5°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960AMOLED 640x400
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 9.5 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionLi-ion 3.6 Ah
Weight290 g340 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: AGM Taipan TM15-384 (spec page); InfiRay Affo AP13 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM15-384 · InfiRay Affo AP13 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More