Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs Zeiss DTI 6/40

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Zeiss's flagship handheld: a 640×480 sensor with a 40 mm F1.0 lens, 3–30x in fine steps, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, live streaming, 755 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384Zeiss DTI 6/40
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×480
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm40 mm
Magnification1–4x3–30x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 10x
Detection range730 m2,000 m
Field of view16.3°11°
DisplayOLED 1024x768AMOLED 1024x768
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 6.5 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650built-in Li-ion
Weight200 g755 g
Water resistanceIP67—
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); Zeiss DTI 6/40 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · Zeiss DTI 6/40 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More