Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs Zeiss DTI 1/19

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Zeiss's entry-level thermal: a 384×288, 12 µm sensor behind a 19 mm F1.0 lens for a 14° field of view, 1,000 m stated detection, 360 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384Zeiss DTI 1/19
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm19 mm
Magnification1–4x1.8–7.2x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range730 m1,000 m
Field of view16.3°14°
DisplayOLED 1024x768LCOS 1280x960
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 6.5 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650built-in Li-ion
Weight200 g360 g
Water resistanceIP67—
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); Zeiss DTI 1/19 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · Zeiss DTI 1/19 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More