Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs ThermTec Cyclops 335 Pro

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
ThermTec's 384×288 Cyclops with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 25 mK, 3.3x base magnification, 12-hour built-in battery and IP67 rating.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384ThermTec Cyclops 335 Pro
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm35 mm
Magnification1–4x3.3–19.8x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 6x
Detection range730 m1,750 m
Field of view16.3°7.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1024x768
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 12 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650built-in 2x 18650 Li-ion
Weight200 g550 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
NETD—≤25 mK
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); ThermTec Cyclops 335 Pro (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · ThermTec Cyclops 335 Pro · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More