A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare
AGM StingIR-384 vs Pulsar Telos XQ35
Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.
The 384×288 Telos: 35 mm lens, 3x base magnification, 1024×768 display and the big 6,400 mAh LPS 7i battery in the upgradeable Telos body.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Specification side by side
| AGM StingIR-384 | Pulsar Telos XQ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | Thermal | Thermal |
| Sensor | 384×288 | 384×288 |
| Pixel pitch | 12 µm | 17 µm |
| Lens | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Magnification | 1–4x | 3–12x |
| Digital zoom | up to 4x | up to 4x |
| Detection range | 730 m | 1,300 m |
| Field of view | 16.3° | 10.7° |
| Display | OLED 1024x768 | AMOLED 1024x768 |
| Battery life | up to 5 h | up to 8.5 h |
| Battery | removable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650 | LPS 7i removable Li-ion 6400 mAh |
| Weight | 200 g | 570 g |
| Water resistance | IP67 | IPX7 |
| NETD | — | ≤25 mK |
| Recording | — | photo and video |
| Wi-Fi / app | — | yes |
Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); Pulsar Telos XQ35 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.
Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · Pulsar Telos XQ35 · all thermal monoculars in stock today
Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More