Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs Nocpix Vista H35R

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 35 mm Vista: 640×512 at 15 mK, 12.5° field of view, 60 Hz, 2560×2560 display, 1,200 m rangefinder and two swappable packs.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384Nocpix Vista H35R
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm35 mm
Magnification1–4x3–28x
Digital zoomup to 4x—
Detection range730 m1,800 m
Field of view16.3°12.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768AMOLED 2560x2560
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 11 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650removable Li-ion pack IBP-7 4400 mAh (two supplied)
Weight200 g640 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67K
NETD—≤15 mK
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); Nocpix Vista H35R (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · Nocpix Vista H35R · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More