A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare
AGM StingIR-384 vs InfiRay Eye III EL25
Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.
The 25 mm model in InfiRay's current Eye III line: 384×288 at 12 µm, 25 mK, 1440×1080 AMOLED display, 8 hours, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Specification side by side
| AGM StingIR-384 | InfiRay Eye III EL25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | Thermal | Thermal |
| Sensor | 384×288 | 384×288 |
| Pixel pitch | 12 µm | 12 µm |
| Lens | 16 mm | 25 mm |
| Magnification | 1–4x | — |
| Digital zoom | up to 4x | — |
| Detection range | 730 m | — |
| Field of view | 16.3° | — |
| Display | OLED 1024x768 | AMOLED 1440x1080 |
| Battery life | up to 5 h | up to 8 h |
| Battery | removable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650 | — |
| Weight | 200 g | 480 g |
| Water resistance | IP67 | IP67 |
| NETD | — | ≤25 mK |
Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); InfiRay Eye III EL25 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.
Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · InfiRay Eye III EL25 · all thermal monoculars in stock today
Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More