Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs InfiRay Affo AP13

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
InfiRay's entry 256×192 pocket thermal with a 13 mm lens, 9.5-hour battery and IP67 rating; 25 Hz refresh.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384InfiRay Affo AP13
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288256×192
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm13 mm
Magnification1–4x2–4x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 2x
Detection range730 m670 m
Field of view16.3°13.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768AMOLED 640x400
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 9.5 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650Li-ion 3.6 Ah
Weight200 g340 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
NETD—≤40 mK
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); InfiRay Affo AP13 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · InfiRay Affo AP13 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More