Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs Guide TD411

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
A compact 384×288 thermal with a 19 mm lens, 13.6° field of view and a 10-hour swappable 18650 cell. No longer in production.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384Guide TD411
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm19 mm
Magnification1–4x1.4–5.6x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range730 m800 m
Field of view16.3°13.6°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 640x400
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 10 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650removable 18650 Li-ion
Weight200 g330 g
Water resistanceIP67—
NETD—≤40 mK
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); Guide TD411 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · Guide TD411 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More