Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs Guide TD210

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Guide's entry 256×192 thermal with a 10 mm lens and 17.5° field of view, an 8-hour swappable cell and a 200 m laser pointer; 25 Hz.
£549.00cheapest tracked listing
Check price on Amazon →

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384Guide TD210
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288256×192
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm10 mm
Magnification1–4x1.8–3.6x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 2x
Detection range730 m400 m
Field of view16.3°17.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768LCOS 1280x960
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 8 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650removable 18650 Li-ion
Weight200 g360 g
Water resistanceIP67—
NETD—≤50 mK
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); Guide TD210 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · Guide TD210 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More