A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare
AGM StingIR-384 vs Burris BTH 35 v2
Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.
Burris's 400×300 handheld thermal with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 1280×960 display, Wi-Fi app control and a tripod thread; a US product sold in small numbers in the UK.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Specification side by side
| AGM StingIR-384 | Burris BTH 35 v2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | Thermal | Thermal |
| Sensor | 384×288 | 400×300 |
| Pixel pitch | 12 µm | 12 µm |
| Lens | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Magnification | 1–4x | — |
| Digital zoom | up to 4x | up to 4x |
| Detection range | 730 m | — |
| Field of view | 16.3° | 7.8° |
| Display | OLED 1024x768 | LCOS 1280x960 |
| Battery life | up to 5 h | up to 5 h |
| Battery | removable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650 | — |
| Weight | 200 g | 624 g |
| Water resistance | IP67 | — |
| Wi-Fi / app | — | yes |
Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); Burris BTH 35 v2 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.
Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · Burris BTH 35 v2 · all thermal monoculars in stock today
Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More