Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm—
Lens16 mm—
Magnification1–4x1.3–5x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range730 m686 m
Field of view16.3°16°
DisplayOLED 1024x7681280x720
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 18 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650built-in Li-ion
Weight200 g850 g
Water resistanceIP67—
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More