Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 384×288 thermal with a second 1080p low-light camera channel, a 600 m laser rangefinder, 35 mm lens and a swappable 18650 cell.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm17 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤25 mK
Lens35 mm35 mm
Magnification3.5–28x2–8x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,653 m1,300 m
Field of view7.5°10.7°
DisplayOLED 1024x768AMOLED 640x400
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 11 h
Batteryremovable 18650 Li-ionAPS 5 removable Li-ion 4900 mAh
Weight510 g470 g
Water resistanceIP67IPX7

Sources: AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 (spec page); Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 · Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More