Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 vs Leica Calonox View

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 384×288 thermal with a second 1080p low-light camera channel, a 600 m laser rangefinder, 35 mm lens and a swappable 18650 cell.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Leica's first-generation handheld thermal (2020): 640×512 at 12 µm, 42 mm lens, 1280×960 LCOS display, 16 GB, about 4–5 hours per charge.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384Leica Calonox View
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK—
Lens35 mm42 mm
Magnification3.5–28x2.5–10x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,653 m1,000 m
Field of view7.5°10.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768LCOS 1280x960
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 4 h
Batteryremovable 18650 Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight510 g685 g
Water resistanceIP67IPX4

Sources: AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 (spec page); Leica Calonox View (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 · Leica Calonox View · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More