Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 vs AGM StingIR-384

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 384×288 thermal with a second 1080p low-light camera channel, a 600 m laser rangefinder, 35 mm lens and a swappable 18650 cell.
no live Amazon listing tracked
A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384AGM StingIR-384
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK—
Lens35 mm16 mm
Magnification3.5–28x1–4x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,653 m730 m
Field of view7.5°16.3°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and video—
Wi-Fi / appyes—
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 5 h
Batteryremovable 18650 Li-ionremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650
Weight510 g200 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 (spec page); AGM StingIR-384 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 · AGM StingIR-384 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More