Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Asp-Micro TM160 vs ThermTec Cyclops 325 Pro

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A pocket-sized 160×120 thermal for gardens and short range: 25° field of view, 10-hour battery, recording, Wi-Fi, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The wide-angle Cyclops: 384×288 at 25 mK behind a 25 mm F1.0 lens for a 10.5° field of view, 2.4x base magnification and a 12-hour battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Asp-Micro TM160ThermTec Cyclops 325 Pro
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor160×120384×288
NETD≤35 mK≤25 mK
Lens6.2 mm25 mm
Magnification0.5–2x2.4–14.4x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 6x
Detection range250 m1,250 m
Field of view24.7°10.5°
DisplayLCOS 720x540AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 10 hup to 12 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight250 g550 g
Water resistanceIP67—
Pixel pitch—12 µm

Sources: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 (spec page); ThermTec Cyclops 325 Pro (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 · ThermTec Cyclops 325 Pro · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More