Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Asp-Micro TM160 vs Pulsar Telos LRF XP50

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A pocket-sized 160×120 thermal for gardens and short range: 25° field of view, 10-hour battery, recording, Wi-Fi, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The Telos XP50 with a 1,000 m laser rangefinder built in; otherwise the same 640×480, 50 mm, 18 mK unit, 60 g heavier.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Asp-Micro TM160Pulsar Telos LRF XP50
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor160×120640×480
NETD≤35 mK≤18 mK
Lens6.2 mm50 mm
Magnification0.5–2x2.5–10x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range250 m1,800 m
Field of view24.7°12.4°
DisplayLCOS 720x540AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 10 hup to 8.5 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionLPS 7i removable Li-ion 6400 mAh
Weight250 g720 g
Water resistanceIP67IPX7
Pixel pitch—17 µm

Sources: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 (spec page); Pulsar Telos LRF XP50 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 · Pulsar Telos LRF XP50 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More