Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Asp-Micro TM160 vs ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A pocket-sized 160×120 thermal for gardens and short range: 25° field of view, 10-hour battery, recording, Wi-Fi, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked
ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Asp-Micro TM160ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor160×120384×288
NETD≤35 mK—
Lens6.2 mm—
Magnification0.5–2x1.3–5x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range250 m686 m
Field of view24.7°16°
DisplayLCOS 720x5401280x720
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 10 hup to 18 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight250 g850 g
Water resistanceIP67—

Sources: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 (spec page); ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 · ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More