Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50 vs HIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The 50 mm model of the original Falcon range: 640×512 at 20 mK with a 7-hour swappable battery. Only part of its specification could be confirmed.
no live Amazon listing tracked
HIKMICRO's original entry thermal: a 256×192 sensor behind a 10 mm lens for an 18° field of view, 8-hour built-in battery, 260 g, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50HIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×512256×192
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤35 mK
Lens50 mm9.7 mm
DisplayOLED 1024x768LCOS 720x540
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7 hup to 8 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionbuilt-in rechargeable Li-ion
Digital zoom—up to 4x
Detection range—458 m
Field of view—18°
Recording—photo and video
Weight—260 g
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50 (spec page); HIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50 · HIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More