The 50 mm model of the original Falcon range: 640×512 at 20 mK with a 7-hour swappable battery. Only part of its specification could be confirmed.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare
HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50 vs HIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH35
Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.
The long-lens Lynx 3.0: 384×288 at 15 mK behind a 35 mm lens for 3.4x base magnification, a 7.5° field of view and 1,800 m stated detection.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Specification side by side
| HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50 | HIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | Thermal | Thermal |
| Sensor | 640×512 | 384×288 |
| Pixel pitch | 12 µm | 12 µm |
| NETD | ≤20 mK | ≤15 mK |
| Lens | 50 mm | 35 mm |
| Display | OLED 1024x768 | AMOLED 1920x1080 |
| Wi-Fi / app | yes | yes |
| Battery life | up to 7 h | up to 5 h |
| Battery | replaceable rechargeable Li-ion | removable 18650 Li-ion |
| Magnification | — | 3.4–27.2x |
| Digital zoom | — | up to 8x |
| Detection range | — | 1,800 m |
| Field of view | — | 7.5° |
| Recording | — | photo and video |
| Weight | — | 354 g |
| Water resistance | — | IP67 |
Sources: HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50 (spec page); HIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH35 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.
Full pages: HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50 · HIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH35 · all thermal monoculars in stock today
Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More