Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50 vs HIKMICRO Gryphon GQ35L

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The 50 mm model of the original Falcon range: 640×512 at 20 mK with a 7-hour swappable battery. Only part of its specification could be confirmed.
no live Amazon listing tracked
HIKMICRO's bi-spectrum monocular: a 640×512 thermal channel with a 35 mm lens, a 1920×1080 optical channel with fusion mode, and a 600 m rangefinder.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50HIKMICRO Gryphon GQ35L
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×512640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤35 mK
Lens50 mm35 mm
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1024x768
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7 hup to 4.5 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionremovable 18650 Li-ion
Magnification—2–16x
Digital zoom—up to 8x
Detection range—1,800 m
Field of view—11°
Recording—photo and video
Weight—510 g
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50 (spec page); HIKMICRO Gryphon GQ35L (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Falcon FQ50 · HIKMICRO Gryphon GQ35L · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More