Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L vs HIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

HIKMICRO's 640×512 rangefinding monocular: 35 mm lens, 12.5° field of view, 1,000 m laser rangefinder and a 6-hour swappable battery at 400 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked
HIKMICRO's original entry thermal: a 256×192 sensor behind a 10 mm lens for an 18° field of view, 8-hour built-in battery, 260 g, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Condor CQ35LHIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×512256×192
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤35 mK
Lens35 mm9.7 mm
Magnification2–16x—
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,800 m458 m
Field of view12.5°18°
DisplayOLED 1024x768LCOS 720x540
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Battery lifeup to 6 hup to 8 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionbuilt-in rechargeable Li-ion
Weight400 g260 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L (spec page); HIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L · HIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More