Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L vs HIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH15

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

HIKMICRO's 640×512 rangefinding monocular: 35 mm lens, 12.5° field of view, 1,000 m laser rangefinder and a 6-hour swappable battery at 400 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The wide-angle Lynx 2.0: a 384×288 sensor at 20 mK behind a 15 mm lens for a 17.5° field of view, in a 272 g IP67 body with a swappable battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Condor CQ35LHIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH15
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×512384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤20 mK
Lens35 mm15 mm
Magnification2–16x1.4–11.2x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 8x
Detection range1,800 m750 m
Field of view12.5°17.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Battery lifeup to 6 hup to 6.5 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionreplaceable rechargeable Li-ion
Weight400 g272 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L (spec page); HIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH15 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L · HIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH15 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More