Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Condor CH25L vs Liemke Keiler 25.1

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The 384×288 Condor: a 25 mm lens, 10.5° field of view, 1,200 m stated detection and a 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 386 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Liemke's compact 384×288 thermal with a 25 mm F1.0 lens, 10.5° field of view, 32 GB memory, IP67 body and a removable pack rated at 10 hours.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Condor CH25LLiemke Keiler 25.1
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤40 mK
Lens25 mm25 mm
Magnification2.5–20x2.4–24x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 10x
Detection range1,200 m1,250 m
Field of view10.5°10.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 6 hup to 10 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionremovable Liemke BP-K Li-ion pack
Weight386 g445 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L (spec page); Liemke Keiler 25.1 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L · Liemke Keiler 25.1 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More