Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Condor CH25L vs HIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH35

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The 384×288 Condor: a 25 mm lens, 10.5° field of view, 1,200 m stated detection and a 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 386 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The long-lens Lynx 3.0: 384×288 at 15 mK behind a 35 mm lens for 3.4x base magnification, a 7.5° field of view and 1,800 m stated detection.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Condor CH25LHIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH35
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤15 mK
Lens25 mm35 mm
Magnification2.5–20x3.4–27.2x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 8x
Detection range1,200 m1,800 m
Field of view10.5°7.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768AMOLED 1920x1080
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 6 hup to 5 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionremovable 18650 Li-ion
Weight386 g354 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L (spec page); HIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH35 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L · HIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH35 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More