Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Condor CH25L vs HIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH25

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The 384×288 Condor: a 25 mm lens, 10.5° field of view, 1,200 m stated detection and a 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 386 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 25 mm Lynx 2.0: 384×288 at 20 mK, 2.4x base magnification, 10.5° field of view and 1,200 m stated detection in a 277 g IP67 body.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Condor CH25LHIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH25
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤20 mK
Lens25 mm25 mm
Magnification2.5–20x2.4–19.2x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 8x
Detection range1,200 m1,200 m
Field of view10.5°10.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 6 hup to 6.5 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionreplaceable rechargeable Li-ion
Weight386 g277 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L (spec page); HIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH25 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L · HIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH25 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More