Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

Guide TD411 vs HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A compact 384×288 thermal with a 19 mm lens, 13.6° field of view and a 10-hour swappable 18650 cell. No longer in production.
no live Amazon listing tracked
HIKMICRO's 640×512 rangefinding monocular: 35 mm lens, 12.5° field of view, 1,000 m laser rangefinder and a 6-hour swappable battery at 400 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

Guide TD411HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤40 mK≤20 mK
Lens19 mm35 mm
Magnification1.4–5.6x2–16x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 8x
Detection range800 m1,800 m
Field of view13.6°12.5°
DisplayOLED 640x400OLED 1024x768
Wi-Fi / appyes—
Battery lifeup to 10 hup to 6 h
Batteryremovable 18650 Li-ionreplaceable rechargeable Li-ion
Weight330 g400 g
Recording—photo and video
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: Guide TD411 (spec page); HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Guide TD411 · HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More