Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

Burris BTH 35 v2 vs Liemke Keiler 25.1

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

Burris's 400×300 handheld thermal with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 1280×960 display, Wi-Fi app control and a tripod thread; a US product sold in small numbers in the UK.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Liemke's compact 384×288 thermal with a 25 mm F1.0 lens, 10.5° field of view, 32 GB memory, IP67 body and a removable pack rated at 10 hours.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

Burris BTH 35 v2Liemke Keiler 25.1
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor400×300384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens35 mm25 mm
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 10x
Field of view7.8°10.5°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960OLED 1024x768
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 10 h
Weight624 g445 g
NETD—≤40 mK
Magnification—2.4–24x
Detection range—1,250 m
Recording—photo and video
Battery—removable Liemke BP-K Li-ion pack
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: Burris BTH 35 v2 (spec page); Liemke Keiler 25.1 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Burris BTH 35 v2 · Liemke Keiler 25.1 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More