Burris's 400×300 handheld thermal with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 1280×960 display, Wi-Fi app control and a tripod thread; a US product sold in small numbers in the UK.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare
Burris BTH 35 v2 vs InfiRay Eye III EL25
Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.
The 25 mm model in InfiRay's current Eye III line: 384×288 at 12 µm, 25 mK, 1440×1080 AMOLED display, 8 hours, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Specification side by side
| Burris BTH 35 v2 | InfiRay Eye III EL25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | Thermal | Thermal |
| Sensor | 400×300 | 384×288 |
| Pixel pitch | 12 µm | 12 µm |
| Lens | 35 mm | 25 mm |
| Digital zoom | up to 4x | — |
| Field of view | 7.8° | — |
| Display | LCOS 1280x960 | AMOLED 1440x1080 |
| Wi-Fi / app | yes | — |
| Battery life | up to 5 h | up to 8 h |
| Weight | 624 g | 480 g |
| NETD | — | ≤25 mK |
| Water resistance | — | IP67 |
Sources: Burris BTH 35 v2 (spec page); InfiRay Eye III EL25 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.
Full pages: Burris BTH 35 v2 · InfiRay Eye III EL25 · all thermal monoculars in stock today
Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More