Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

Burris BTH 35 v2 vs InfiRay Affo AP13

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

Burris's 400×300 handheld thermal with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 1280×960 display, Wi-Fi app control and a tripod thread; a US product sold in small numbers in the UK.
no live Amazon listing tracked
InfiRay's entry 256×192 pocket thermal with a 13 mm lens, 9.5-hour battery and IP67 rating; 25 Hz refresh.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

Burris BTH 35 v2InfiRay Affo AP13
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor400×300256×192
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens35 mm13 mm
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 2x
Field of view7.8°13.5°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960AMOLED 640x400
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 9.5 h
Weight624 g340 g
NETD—≤40 mK
Magnification—2–4x
Detection range—670 m
Recording—photo and video
Battery—Li-ion 3.6 Ah
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: Burris BTH 35 v2 (spec page); InfiRay Affo AP13 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Burris BTH 35 v2 · InfiRay Affo AP13 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More