Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

Burris BTH 35 v2 vs HIKMICRO Condor CH25L

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

Burris's 400×300 handheld thermal with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 1280×960 display, Wi-Fi app control and a tripod thread; a US product sold in small numbers in the UK.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 384×288 Condor: a 25 mm lens, 10.5° field of view, 1,200 m stated detection and a 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 386 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

Burris BTH 35 v2HIKMICRO Condor CH25L
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor400×300384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens35 mm25 mm
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 8x
Field of view7.8°10.5°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960OLED 1024x768
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 6 h
Weight624 g386 g
NETD—≤20 mK
Magnification—2.5–20x
Detection range—1,200 m
Recording—photo and video
Battery—replaceable rechargeable Li-ion
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: Burris BTH 35 v2 (spec page); HIKMICRO Condor CH25L (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Burris BTH 35 v2 · HIKMICRO Condor CH25L · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More