Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs ThermTec Wild 335

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
ThermTec's 2024 Wild series 384×288 monocular: 18 mK, 35 mm lens, 64 GB memory, GPS, electronic stabilisation and a swappable 18650 cell rated at 10 hours.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xThermTec Wild 335
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Magnification1.3–5x3.3–13.2x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range686 m1,800 m
Field of view16°7.5°
Display1280x720AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 10 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable 18650 Li-ion
Weight850 g485 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
NETD—≤18 mK
Lens—35 mm
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); ThermTec Wild 335 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · ThermTec Wild 335 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More