Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs Nocpix Vista H35R

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 35 mm Vista: 640×512 at 15 mK, 12.5° field of view, 60 Hz, 2560×2560 display, 1,200 m rangefinder and two swappable packs.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xNocpix Vista H35R
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Magnification1.3–5x3–28x
Digital zoomup to 4x—
Detection range686 m1,800 m
Field of view16°12.5°
Display1280x720AMOLED 2560x2560
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 11 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable Li-ion pack IBP-7 4400 mAh (two supplied)
Weight850 g640 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
NETD—≤15 mK
Lens—35 mm
Water resistance—IP67K

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); Nocpix Vista H35R (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · Nocpix Vista H35R · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More