Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs Liemke Keiler 25.1

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Liemke's compact 384×288 thermal with a 25 mm F1.0 lens, 10.5° field of view, 32 GB memory, IP67 body and a removable pack rated at 10 hours.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xLiemke Keiler 25.1
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Magnification1.3–5x2.4–24x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 10x
Detection range686 m1,250 m
Field of view16°10.5°
Display1280x720OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 10 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable Liemke BP-K Li-ion pack
Weight850 g445 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
NETD—≤40 mK
Lens—25 mm
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); Liemke Keiler 25.1 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · Liemke Keiler 25.1 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More