Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs InfiRay Finder FH25R

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
A wide-angle 640×512 Finder: 25 mm lens, 17.5° field of view, 600 m rangefinder, in a 320 g body. Discontinued but still traded.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xInfiRay Finder FH25R
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Magnification1.3–5x1.5–6x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range686 m1,298 m
Field of view16°17.5°
Display1280x720LCOS 1280x960
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 6 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight850 g320 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
NETD—≤40 mK
Lens—25 mm
Water resistance—IP66

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); InfiRay Finder FH25R (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · InfiRay Finder FH25R · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More