Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs InfiRay Eye III EL25

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 25 mm model in InfiRay's current Eye III line: 384×288 at 12 µm, 25 mK, 1440×1080 AMOLED display, 8 hours, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xInfiRay Eye III EL25
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Magnification1.3–5x—
Digital zoomup to 4x—
Detection range686 m—
Field of view16°—
Display1280x720AMOLED 1440x1080
Recordingphoto and video—
Wi-Fi / appyes—
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 8 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ion—
Weight850 g480 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
NETD—≤25 mK
Lens—25 mm
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); InfiRay Eye III EL25 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · InfiRay Eye III EL25 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More