Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs InfiRay Affo AP13

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
InfiRay's entry 256×192 pocket thermal with a 13 mm lens, 9.5-hour battery and IP67 rating; 25 Hz refresh.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xInfiRay Affo AP13
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288256×192
Magnification1.3–5x2–4x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 2x
Detection range686 m670 m
Field of view16°13.5°
Display1280x720AMOLED 640x400
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 9.5 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionLi-ion 3.6 Ah
Weight850 g340 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
NETD—≤40 mK
Lens—13 mm
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); InfiRay Affo AP13 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · InfiRay Affo AP13 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More