Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs HIKMICRO Condor CH25L

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 384×288 Condor: a 25 mm lens, 10.5° field of view, 1,200 m stated detection and a 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 386 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xHIKMICRO Condor CH25L
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Magnification1.3–5x2.5–20x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 8x
Detection range686 m1,200 m
Field of view16°10.5°
Display1280x720OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 6 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionreplaceable rechargeable Li-ion
Weight850 g386 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
NETD—≤20 mK
Lens—25 mm
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); HIKMICRO Condor CH25L (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · HIKMICRO Condor CH25L · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More