ATN's 640×480 thermal binocular with a 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 60 Hz sensor, video recording and a 16-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Home › Models › Thermal binoculars › Compare
ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25x vs Pulsar Merger LRF XL50
Two thermal binoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.
The Merger with a 1024×768 thermal sensor — the highest resolution in a consumer handheld — plus a 1,000 m rangefinder and 64 GB memory.
£3,137.47cheapest tracked listing
Specification side by side
| ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25x | Pulsar Merger LRF XL50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | Thermal | Thermal |
| Sensor | 640×480 | 1024×768 |
| NETD | ≤25 mK | ≤40 mK |
| Magnification | 2.5–25x | 2.5–20x |
| Digital zoom | up to 10x | up to 8x |
| Field of view | 12.5° | 14° |
| Display | 2x 1280x720 | AMOLED 1024x768 |
| Recording | photo and video | photo and video |
| Wi-Fi / app | yes | yes |
| Battery life | up to 16 h | up to 7 h |
| Battery | built-in Li-ion (USB-C) | built-in 4000 mAh + APS 3 removable 3200 mAh Li-ion |
| Weight | 1,120 g | 950 g |
| Pixel pitch | — | 12 µm |
| Lens | — | 50 mm |
| Detection range | — | 2,300 m |
| Water resistance | — | IPX7 |
Sources: ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25x (spec page); Pulsar Merger LRF XL50 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.
Full pages: ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25x · Pulsar Merger LRF XL50 · all thermal binoculars in stock today
Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More