Home › Models › Thermal binoculars › Compare

ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25x vs HIKMICRO Habrok HQ35L

Two thermal binoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's 640×480 thermal binocular with a 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 60 Hz sensor, video recording and a 16-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 640×512 Habrok: a wider 12.5° thermal view than the HH35L, the same 2560-pixel night vision channel and 1,000 m rangefinder.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25xHIKMICRO Habrok HQ35L
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×480640×512
NETD≤25 mK≤20 mK
Magnification2.5–25x3–24x
Digital zoomup to 10xup to 8x
Field of view12.5°12.5°
Display2x 1280x720OLED 1920x1080
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyes—
Battery lifeup to 16 hup to 6 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ion (USB-C)2x replaceable rechargeable Li-ion
Weight1,120 g780 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
Lens—35 mm
Detection range—1,800 m
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25x (spec page); HIKMICRO Habrok HQ35L (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25x · HIKMICRO Habrok HQ35L · all thermal binoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More