Home › Models › Thermal binoculars › Compare

AGM Voyage TB50-640 vs Pulsar Merger LRF XL50

Two thermal binoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's fusion thermal binocular: 640×512 at 20 mK with a 50 mm F0.9 lens, a 2560×1440 low-light channel, 1,000 m rangefinder and three 18650 cells.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Voyage TB50-640Pulsar Merger LRF XL50
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×5121024×768
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤40 mK
Lens50 mm50 mm
Magnification3.5–56x2.5–20x
Digital zoomup to 16xup to 8x
Detection range2,600 m2,300 m
Field of view8.7°14°
DisplayOLED 1024x768AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 8 hup to 7 h
Battery3x removable 18650 Li-ionbuilt-in 4000 mAh + APS 3 removable 3200 mAh Li-ion
Weight1,120 g950 g
Water resistanceIP67IPX7

Sources: AGM Voyage TB50-640 (spec page); Pulsar Merger LRF XL50 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Voyage TB50-640 · Pulsar Merger LRF XL50 · all thermal binoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More