Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 vs Zeiss DTI 3/25 Gen 2

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 384×288 thermal with a second 1080p low-light camera channel, a 600 m laser rangefinder, 35 mm lens and a swappable 18650 cell.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The wide-angle Zeiss DTI 3: 384×288 behind a 25 mm F1.0 lens for a 15° field of view and 930 m stated detection, 410 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384Zeiss DTI 3/25 Gen 2
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm17 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤35 mK
Lens35 mm25 mm
Magnification3.5–28x1.7–6.8x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,653 m930 m
Field of view7.5°15°
DisplayOLED 1024x768AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 8 h
Batteryremovable 18650 Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight510 g410 g
Water resistanceIP67—

Sources: AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 (spec page); Zeiss DTI 3/25 Gen 2 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 · Zeiss DTI 3/25 Gen 2 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More