Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 vs HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 384×288 thermal with a second 1080p low-light camera channel, a 600 m laser rangefinder, 35 mm lens and a swappable 18650 cell.
no live Amazon listing tracked
HIKMICRO's 640×512 rangefinding monocular: 35 mm lens, 12.5° field of view, 1,000 m laser rangefinder and a 6-hour swappable battery at 400 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤20 mK
Lens35 mm35 mm
Magnification3.5–28x2–16x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 8x
Detection range1,653 m1,800 m
Field of view7.5°12.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyes—
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 6 h
Batteryremovable 18650 Li-ionreplaceable rechargeable Li-ion
Weight510 g400 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 (spec page); HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Fuzion LRF TM35-384 · HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More